Given the head of a linked list, reverse the nodes of the list k at a time, and return the modified list.
k is a positive integer and is less than or equal to the length of the linked list. If the number of nodes is not a multiple of k then left-out nodes, in the end, should remain as it is.
You may not alter the values in the list’s nodes, only nodes themselves may be changed.
Example 1:
1 2
Input: head = [1,2,3,4,5], k = 2 Output: [2,1,4,3,5]
Example 2:
1 2
Input: head = [1,2,3,4,5], k = 3 Output: [3,2,1,4,5]
Constraints:
The number of nodes in the list is n.
1 <= k <= n <= 5000
0 <= Node.val <= 1000
Follow-up: Can you solve the problem in O(1) extra memory space?
Hints/Notes
2023/08/03
Check if there are k nodes, otherwise just return head
Reverse(head, tail), then apply the function to further nodes
/** * Definition for singly-linked list. * struct ListNode { * int val; * ListNode *next; * ListNode() : val(0), next(nullptr) {} * ListNode(int x) : val(x), next(nullptr) {} * ListNode(int x, ListNode *next) : val(x), next(next) {} * }; */ classSolution { public: ListNode* reverseKGroup(ListNode* head, int k){ ListNode *tail = head; for (int i = 0; i < k; i++) { if (tail) { tail = tail->next; } else { return head; } } ListNode *newHead = reverse(head, tail); head->next = reverseKGroup(tail, k); // Note: // At first i was trying to do reverseKGroup() first then reverse(), i.e // // reverseKGroup(tail, k); // ListNode *newHead = reverse(head, tail); // // But it run into problem because the tail has been changed and the afterwards // reverse would fail. It's also more complicated to understand than the current // implementation, i.e. reverse just return a reversed linked list ending with nullptr return newHead; }